I found this book to be a very enjoyable read. It blends scientific acceptance and theistic belief, which Mr Collins’ adheres to and reminds his readers that we must all realise the importance of holding both in tension.
I have mentioned before in other blog posts that I try to read a non-Christian book, and then a Christian book, aiming to have people attempt to explain their worldview and the reasons behind why they believe what they believe. It’s important to focus on thought processes, explanations and reasons. We should never stop learning, we should never take our current position as unmovable and we owe it to ourselves to keep stretching what we believe and why we believe it.
Mr Collins has a fantastic understanding of the human genome, having headed up the Human Genome Project which managed to map the whole human genome. It has done marvellous things for both science and medicine, and he does a great job at explaining how hard and how important both the task and the results were to achieve.
But this book isn’t solely looking at the Human Genome Project. It is looking at how a very accomplished scientist can also hold a position of faith, believing in the Christian God as being real and true. It will be of no surprise to you, but not all Christian’s believe the same thing, the same if true of Atheist’s. Mr Collins’ does a really good job of explaining why he believes what he believes against other atheist, agnostic and Christian worldviews.
The book is very well written, I was surprised at how quickly I got through it and how much I took away from it. The stories are interesting, and the content is clear and well explained. The scientific side to this book is fantastically informative and at the moment I was beginning to get a bit confused as to why he was going into this much detail about the Human Genome Project (or some other scientific tangent), he shifts track and re-engaged my attention. Something a lot of writers get wrong a lot of the time. He uses what he talks about, and it all comes together really well.
The faith side of Mr Collins argument seems to boil down to reflections on the variety of options currently available to humanity as to why we are here and the labels that we give ourselves to live out from. He tackles the following in quick succinct ways: Agnostic, Atheist, Creationist, Intelligent Design (ID), BioLogos (all life coming out of the Word – God). Mr Collins falls into the final category, which I found hard to understand and differentiate opposed to the ID view. I felt BioLogos was more of a nice way to move away from the known pitfalls of ID and create a new science-faith label to live out of.
The stories are engaging, and the reflections are real and honest, I am just not sure that I can say I would have found the same things draw me to the conclusions that Mr Collins makes. There seems to be a scientific side that I really appreciate and admire in Mr Collins. There is also an honest reflective side which is really nice to read about and engage with, but then there is the landing point, a belief in God, which I find unjustified and was a bit confused as to why he was stopping there.
When he speaks about his atheism of his early life and university days, it also seems that he took atheism at face value and didn’t spend time asking questions, reading books and being moved to ask, ‘why do I take this position’ or ‘what do I really think’. He has clearly been very moved by the likes of C. S. Lewis and quotes him a number of times. Now, I love C. S. Lewis and to a thinking Christian he is a very good source of reason and logic. But the same thing within C. S. Lewis happens within Mr Collins’ work.
We can imply, suggest, hope and dream of an all-loving God who knows us and holds us within His plans and purposes, but we can’t know it. This doesn’t seem to bother a lot of people. I find it a very hard hurdle to overcome, obviously. If God is real then He is tangible, He is knowable and He is within the very fabric of this world, because He created it and knows it. He knows what it takes to convince people within the 21st century that He is there, He knows what it would take to convince me that He is real, but I am not convinced.
People say to me – ‘why would God give you special revelation, when He doesn’t do that for anyone else’. But I would argue that the Bible speaks about God’s people knowing God, that he writes His law upon their heart, He dwells with them, He is the groom of the Church, His bride. We can look at specific moments within scripture as well, Moses seeing the face of God and having to wear a veil, Paul and his road to Damascus experience, Simon-Peter meeting God in flesh.
I don’t think I am asking for anything special, I just want to know that God is real and that my beliefs in Him, that I used to hold, are correct and tenable. But I can’t know this, at least I have not come across anything that convinces me as of yet, and as I keep saying (through this blog), I don’t think I have control over what does or does not convince me.
Maybe Mr Collins’ is in the same place as me. Maybe he can’t ‘prove’ God is real and that is why he looks to story’s, emotion and the other options (agnosticism, IR or atheism) to help him push into a belief in God, back into BioLogos. But hope isn’t a basis for a life encapsulating decision.
Justin Brierley had Francis Collins on his show in June 2020 and I managed to get the above segment asked of him directly. It was really nice of Justin to ask him and although I don’t think he answered my question in and of itself, it was still interesting to see how he answers it. You can listen to the question being asked and the response by watching the following and skipping to 56:45.
‘The pure, clean water of spiritual truth is placed in rusty containers, and the subsequent failings of the church down through the centuries should not be projected onto the faith itself, as if the water had been the problem.’ Collins, Francis. The Language of God (p. 40). Simon & Schuster UK. Kindle Edition.
This is a really interesting point, and I can see why it would give believers a sense of relief and comfort. I can also see the biblical arguments for it, humanity is fallen and just because we are now ‘saved’ through Christ’s saving gift of Himself, it doesn’t mean we aren’t still living in sin. The problem is you would also expect to see a difference between believers and unbelievers, from what I can see to date, I can’t.
‘If God is outside of nature, then science can neither prove nor disprove His existence. Atheism itself must therefore be considered a form of blind faith, in that it adopts a belief system that cannot be defended on the basis of pure reason.’ Collins, Francis. The Language of God (p. 165). Simon & Schuster UK. Kindle Edition.
I have mentioned this before, it takes faith to believe in anything. We can never know for complete certainty that something is true, it will always require a level of belief or faith, however small. The problem comes when you call atheism ‘blind faith’, which I don’t think is true. We can make informed steps towards our knowing, even if we can’t get the whole way. For example, I would argue that there could well be a God who created the universe and then stopped being involved with it, I think you could reasonably believe that if you so desired, the issue is you cannot know it to be true. The second issue is that the Bible speaks of a God who is actively involved with the world around us today, that means that we should be able to interact, experience and study Him. So, to be an atheist, who claims ‘I don’t think there is enough evidence to prove the existence of a God’ isn’t ‘blind faith’, rather it’s a logical conclusion based on the evidence we have to hand and have spent time investigating.
Finally – I want to thank Mr Collins’ for writing this book. It’s a really good read, and I would encourage everyone to pick it up, engage with it and reflect on his words as you work your way through it. This book does the world a service by reinforcing the scientific theory and fact of evolution, down to the human genome and how we now understand why certain medicines affect us in certain ways, it’s all there, in the code. He makes it very clear that you really can’t say evolution isn’t true. I walked away more convinced of my convictions than moved to a faith in God.
I would love to chat to Mr Collins about his story and reflect on the touch points within my own story. I would love to find the precise location where he steps over into faith, and then to know what extra information, or thought processes have enabled him to believe that he has a relationship with a God. What is it that means I cannot? I guess that is the whole point of this blog though… It’s a journey of discovery.
_End of Blog Blurb_
Thanks for taking the time to read my blog. It has taken me a few years to get to a place where I am able to share my loss of faith and to start writing about the journey that I am still on for you all. I hope you find it useful.
Support: The podcast and blog will always be advertisement-free, and your generous support on Patreon will enable us to continue doing this effectively and to a higher standard over the years to come. Please consider supporting the work we do.
Alternatively, you can support this work with a one-off gift via PayPal.
Podcast: If you like what you read then you could always check out the podcast ‘When Belief Dies’, it is available on all major podcasting platforms or you can listen/watch via YouTube. I upload and publish via Anchor FM each Wednesday at 7 am. For early access, support me on Patreon.
Grammar, spelling, capitalisation and punctuation: I am massively dyslexic. It has taken me years to get to the level I am currently at with writing and I have done this mainly through reading. I want to be better and ask you, reader, to please forgive any errors in my writing. I hope you notice improvement upon improvement over the coming years.
Time Frame: This blog is roughly twenty-four months behind where I currently am at in my journey out of religion. It’s important to remember that when reading and commenting.
If you want to get every post straight to your inbox then you can do that by either following directly via WordPress or with your email address, whichever you prefer. The links for that and social media are to the right if you’re on a computer, or at the very bottom if you’re on a phone or tablet.
I’ll see you back here at the same time next week 🙂
When Belief Dies #67 – 'Psychedelics, History & Hope' with Pat Smith – When Belief Dies
- When Belief Dies #67 – 'Psychedelics, History & Hope' with Pat Smith
- When Belief Dies #66 – 'Social Contracts' with Kane B
- When Belief Dies #65 – 'History for Atheists' with Tim O'Neill
- When Belief Dies #64 – 'The morality of an Infidel' with Simon Blackburn
- When Belief Dies #63 – 'Dominion' with Tom Holland