I’ve been doing a lot of reading and thinking recently. I have come to the realisation that there is a real importance held within being sceptical, even if you sit within a religious framework.

The more I talk to people, the more I notice that humans take for granted that which confirms their worldview and challenge that which speaks against their worldview. When I was within Christianity, if I heard a story of healing or how someone is now ‘on fire for the Lord’, I would have allowed it to be used as the person telling the story wanted to use it, usually to encourage the audience in their faith. But now I look back on those times and I am really surprised how easily I let ‘facts’ and ‘truth’ evade any sense checking apparatus in my brain, simply because I wanted to believe it was true.

Part of me honestly believes that if I had allowed myself to be sceptical far earlier in my journey out of faith then I would have seen where the actual challenges for and against Christianity resided far sooner. Therefore, enabling me to engage with those areas upon discovery, rather than months or years after I have left the religion.

Even within the ‘Agnostic Atheist’ framework that I talk about in my blog, I need to be sceptical on accepting things that simply re-affirm or encourage my outlook today, because who knows if it is actually true. I think that maintaining a high level of scepticism enables one to test, query, investigate and work through the information that is being passed on in a helpful way. It gives you the ability to believe things that have passed rigorous testing, hopefully, both within the world and within your mind. Of course, people will still believe things that are not correct, even after employing a high level of scepticism, but I think a lot of the issues around a blind belief or confirmation bias based belief would be solved or at least highlighted to the individual fairly more quickly.

Rather it stops your resting on assumptions and forces you to seek real reflections on what is in the world around you. For example, I really do believe that many atheists use atheism as their worldview. Atheism isn’t a worldview, it’s a state of none belief. Being sceptical stops you from living out of ‘atheism’, much like it would stop you from just accepting everything you read or hear from your Christian circles if you are a believer.

Being able to step back from atheism and ask the questions that atheism leads to is vital to living in an honest frame of mind. There is so much that doesn’t get spoken about within atheist circles because atheism is simply the answer when it isn’t – it’s just a statement about what you don’t believe, not why you don’t believe it.

I think there is also a real power in honestly saying ‘I don’t know’. Humans enjoy trying to make everything fit together seamlessly, ensuring that a specific worldview holds answers that cover everything. Life just isn’t like that. Even within religious circles (pick any religion) there are splits and denominations purely because people either believe different things or explain the world in different ways.

I don’t have the answers. This is why I remain sceptical about so much. What I enjoy is learning and asking others ‘what do you think about X’, and the truth is, if someone can change my mind or show me how their worldview interacts with reality then I want to learn more. Because maybe they have something that I don’t, and maybe elements of why they believe X need to be examined more closely.

I am sure there are other reasons to not be sceptical, but it seems to me that on the whole scepticism can be a tool and a healthy way to live your life. It’s important to live honestly as you search, and I think this framework allows people to do both as they journey their way through life.

It is far easier to be sceptical than to bring a ‘truth’ or ‘belief’ to the foreground and defend it against criticism. I also don’t want to sit within something because it makes things easier, life isn’t about ease.

_End of Blog Blurb_

Thanks for taking the time to read my blog. It has taken me a few years to get to a place where I am able to share my loss of faith and to start writing about the journey that I am still on for you all. I hope you find it useful.

Support: The podcast and blog will always be advertisement-free, and your generous support on Patreon will enable us to continue doing this effectively and to a higher standard over the years to come. Please consider supporting the work we do.

Alternatively, you can support this work with a one-off gift via PayPal.

Podcast: If you like what you read then you could always check out the podcast ‘When Belief Dies’, it is available on all major podcasting platforms or you can listen/watch via YouTube. I upload and publish via Anchor FM each Wednesday at 7 am. For early access, support me on Patreon.

Grammar, spelling, capitalisation and punctuation: I am massively dyslexic. It has taken me years to get to the level I am currently at with writing and I have done this mainly through reading. I want to be better and ask you, reader, to please forgive any errors in my writing. I hope you notice improvement upon improvement over the coming years.

Time Frame: This blog is roughly twelve to twenty-four months behind where I currently am in my journey out of religion. It’s important to remember that when reading and commenting.

If you want to get every post straight to your inbox then you can do that by either following directly via WordPress or with your email address, whichever you prefer. The links for that and social media are to the right if you’re on a computer, or at the very bottom if you’re on a phone or tablet.

I’ll see you back here at the same time next week 🙂


Farewell For Now When Belief Dies

It's time to stop, even though it breaks my heart. This episode serves as my reason why.   -Sam
  1. Farewell For Now
  2. When Belief Dies #100 – 'Psychedelics, Philosophy & God' with Peter Sjöstedt-Hughes
  3. When Belief Dies #99 – 'Open and Relational Theology' with Thomas Jay Oord
  4. When Belief Dies #98 – 'The Take Over' with Daniel Kelly & Roger Bretherton
  5. When Belief Dies #97 – 'The End?' with Daniel Kelly

7 Comments. Leave new

  • Hello Sam. Hope all is well with you. Discernment and skepticism—how do you compare them?

  • whenbeliefdies
    November 12, 2021 4:03 pm

    Discernment is about grasping what is obscure, and scepticism is about a critical attitude towards knowledge claims. Hope that helps 🙂

  • Here’s why I asked…skepticism is not natural or innate; it is learned, either by being taught by others, or by personally experiencing disappointments in life. Small children believe what they’re told. They learn later in life that errors and deception call for tempering unconditional trust, and to require some form and degree of assurance in order to hold an expectation. In a Christian framework, then, skepticism is a product of a fallen world. Where knowledge of truth, honest communication, and integrity are lacking, skepticism becomes a tool created by man for his protection. In the ideal Christian framework, skepticism has no place. However, the Bible does call for making proper judgements about things. It is not done through skepticism, but through discernment. The question is, how does one make the proper discernment? How does one go about “grasping what is obscure?”

    • whenbeliefdies
      November 13, 2021 6:11 am

      I would also argue that discernment ‘is not natural or innate; it is learned.’ Discernment of the unprovable requires a learned spiritual framework, that’s usually agreed by a group, such as a denomination, church or family, and then teated, amended where needed and utilised.

      Real discernment comes to those highly trained and skilled, such as a GP or Psychiatrist, but they then go one to see if what they’ve discerned is right or not. They do not stay in the unprovable.

      I feel like your original question and follow up are just trying to push a Christian agenda, rather than engaging with what I’ve said 😒

      • Pushing?…not at all. It goes back to your opening paragraph about skepticism within a religious framework. What if skepticism is not the appropriate tool?

  • whenbeliefdies
    November 14, 2021 7:23 am

    The rest of blog post is there for a reason 😆

    You asked me to define the two words, without any reason at the start. I’ve done so and the post sits within and makes sense in scepticism.

  • No problem. Knowledge, belief, trust, skepticism, and how and why we choose what we do have long been a fascination for me. I was just looking to go into it a little deeper from your article. Not the place for that.


Leave a Reply

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

You May Also Like

Big Update (Welcome Kirsty!)
Book Review: Waking Up


Must Read

%d bloggers like this: